Legal Opinion

Majestic Loan Co. v. Edmondson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1935No. 25373PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal presents error from the court of common pleas, Tulsa county, and wag instituted in tliat court by S. W. Edmondson, as plaintiff, against the Majestic Loan Company, as defendant, to recover usurious interest charged plaintiff by defendant. Jury was waived by the parties and the issues were tried to the court. The court found for plaintiff and defendant appeals. The parties in this appeal will be referred to and designated as plaintiff and defendant, the same as they stood in the trial court.

Plaintiff bases his action upon a second amended petition, in which it is alleged: That…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clement Mortgage Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Dies v. Bank of Commerce of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Fidelity Security Corp. v. BrugmanOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Cassetta v. BaimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Vose v. U.S. Cities CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shoenfelt v. Donna Belle Loan & Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Mercer & Co. v. PortSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Finn v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. New Hampshire Savings Bank v. National Rockland BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
  5. Liberty Plan Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API