Fidelity Security Corp. v. Brugman
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Preliminary to a consideration of the assignments of error, we deem it well to state the following few undisputed facts. The execution of the $2,310 note which constitutes the subject-matter of this action had its inception in the following transaction: In September, 1926, the defendants, who are engaged in the real estate and timber business, were apprised by one Ben F. Walling, a real estate broker, that a parcel of real property known as the Juliana Apartments in Portland could be purchased for the sum of $52,500 payable $15,000 in cash and the balance in deferred payments secured by a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Houghton v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Bank of Lumpkin v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Balfour v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1886
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Shields v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. LerchOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Williams v. HavensIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- Sabin v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.