Legal Opinion
Barnard Bakeshops, Inc. v. Dirig
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 18, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeyo, J.
The plaintiff brings these actions for permanent injunctions and seeks by this motion injunctions pendente lite against the defendants to enforce the restrictive provisions of certain contracts entered into between the plaintiff and the defendants, respectively, and to enjoin the defendants from disclosing certain lists of customers to others.
The complaints, which are substantially identical except for names, dates and route descriptions, allege that the plaintiff has invested large sums of money in its bakery business in which it has been engaged for many years; that its products are sold at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Witkop v. BoyceNew York Supreme Court · 1908
- Foster v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Foster v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lee v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- National Starch Products Inc. v. Polymer Industries Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Scientific Management Institute, Inc. v. MirrerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Frye v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
- Greater Eastern Transport LLC v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.