By-Buk Co. v. Printed Cellophane Tape Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE, J. pro tem. *
Defendants appeal from a judgment enjoining them from using, assembling, or manufacturing certain machinery which was a trade secret of the plaintiff; ordering them to dismantle the machines assembled by them that embodied plaintiff’s trade secret and decreeing that the plaintiff is entitled to damages, both compensatory and punitive, to be fixed upon an accounting hereinafter to be had.
Prior to June of 1954 both the plaintiff and the defendants Gevirtz, doing business as copartners under the name of Printed Cellophane Tape Company, hereinafter called “Tape Company, ’ ’…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Orkin Ex. Co. Inc., So. Georgia v. DewberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Bradley Co. v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Stone v. GossSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Diodes, Inc. v. FranzenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Space Aero Products Co. v. R. E. Darling Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Tri-Tron International, a Montana Corporation v. A. A. Velto and William Wurz, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Ed Nowogroski Insurance v. RuckerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.