Legal Opinion

Brand v. Tisch

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 7, 1966No. Civ. A. 65 Civ. 367PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERLANDS, District Judge:

Defendants have moved for an order:

“(a) Pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, striking plaintiff’s verification of the complaint and dismissing the complaint, for failure to comply with Rule 23(b) of the Federal Rules of [Civil] Procedure; and(b) Pursuant to Rules 11 and 41(b) of the Federal Rules of [Civil] Procedure, striking plaintiff’s attorneys [sic] certification of the complaint for failure to comply with Rule 11; and(c) Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of [Civil] Procedure granting summary judgment for defendants against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Murchison v. KirbyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  3. Freeman v. KirbyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. Nichols v. AlkerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1954

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nemeroff v. AbelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Nemeroff v. AbelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. General Electric Co. v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  4. Rogosin v. SteadmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  5. Berne Street Enterprises, Inc. v. American Export Isbrandtsen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API