Rogosin v. Steadman
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
*366MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
OWEN, District Judge.
These actions commenced separately in 1969 by plaintiffs Mary Rogosin and Kenneth Herman are united in a consolidated supplemental complaint. Each plaintiff owns shares in Steadman Science and Growth Fund, Inc. (“Science”) and sued derivatively for the benefit of Science under the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisor’s Act, and the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934. The consolidated complaint, noting that Science had merged into Steadman American Industry Fund, Inc. (“American”), charges, among other things, that Science did not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brand v. TischDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Banco Cafetero InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Kaplan v. PomerantzDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Porte v. HOME FED. S. & L. ASS'N OF CHICAGODistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
- Brown v. Hart, Schaffner & MarxDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- George v. LeBlancDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.