Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Kirby

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 6, 1961PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKS, District Judge.

This is a motion to strike the complaint as sham within the meaning and intent of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

The complaint alleges, in essence, that in 1954 and 1955 a series of suits by stockholders of Alleghany Corporation, later consolidated under the captions Breswick & Co. et al. v. Briggs et al. and Zenn et al. v. Anzalone et al., were brought in this Court and in the New York State Supreme Court respectively, that one Randolph Phillips acted as a consultant to one or more of the plaintiffs in the Zenn and Breswick actions, that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bates v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Reynolds Metals Co. v. Metals Disintegrating Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  4. Murchison v. KirbyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  5. Rosen v. Texas CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. PriceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
  2. Van Christo Advertising, Inc. v. M/A-COM/LCSMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Helfant v. Louisiana & Southern Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1979
  4. Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  5. Wagner v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn Loeb Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API