Legal Opinion

State v. Proctor

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 4, 1941No. 3186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

I. The motion to set aside the verdict as against the law and the evidence presented no question not saved by special exceptions taken seasonably during the trial (Shea v. Manchester, 89 N. H. 547, 549, and cases cited). As no such exceptions, with a possible qualification hereinafter mentioned, are reserved, the law of the trial became final. On the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, the trial court’s finding that inadequacy of weight was not proved is to be upheld if it is sustainable. Wisutskie v. Malouin, 88 N. H. 242, 246. Examination of the evidence does not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wisutskie v. MalouinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  3. Shea v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TaschlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  2. State v. LangelierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
  3. Ayers v. GordonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  4. Juster Bros. Inc. v. ChristgauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API