Legal Opinion

Shea v. Manchester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 6, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

Counsel for the defendant concede that the city of Manchester in furnishing water to its inhabitants at established rates acts in a private, proprietary capacity and may therefore be held liable for an injury caused by the negligent maintenance of its water system. See Douglas v. Hollis, 86 N. H. 578, 580, and cases cited. The accident occurred on the afternoon of June 5, 1936, and the cap over which the plaintiff fell had worked up some three inches above the level of the sidewalk through the action of the frost that spring.

Since this situation was created by weather conditions and since…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bennett v. LaroseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. Wisutskie v. MalouinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  3. Hould v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  4. Barrett v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  5. Douglas v. HollisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Day v. City of BerlinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
  2. State v. ProctorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  3. Ayers v. GordonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  4. Tucker v. HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API