Legal Opinion · Dissent

Juster Bros. Inc. v. Christgau

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 2, 1943No. 33,242PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Dissent

The terms of the unemployment compensation act as it stood when the facts here controlling arose make it evident that it was the intention of the legislature that an employer who fails to give notice of an employe's disqualification for benefits when required by the industrial commission should not be permitted to question the charging of his account when the employe was granted benefits, and this notwithstanding that the employer, through his own failure to give notice of the disqualification, had not been notified of the proceedings by which the employe's rights to benefits were determined.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Maine Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Androscoggin Junior, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  3. Webb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. State v. ProctorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  5. Farrell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Juster Bros. Inc. v. ChristgauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API