Legal Opinion

Merit Behavioral Care Corp. v. State of Vermont Independent Panel of Mental Health Providers

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 6, 2004No. 02-271PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. Merit Behavioral Care Corporation, a review agent that contracted with the State during the relevant time period to provide mental health care benefits to state employees, appeals the superior court’s summary judgment order dismissing its complaint seeking to overturn an independent panel’s decision that Merit should have provided coverage for state employee Jane Doe’s mental health treatment at the Austen Riggs Center. Merit contends that the superior court erred in concluding that (1) Merit had a statutory obligation to provide prospective or concurrent review of Jane Doe’s treatment…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Presbyterian Hospital v. Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Toys, Inc. v. F.M. Burlington Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Tyrrell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  4. Richart v. JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  5. Carr v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Travelers Insurance Company v. Susan J. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Appeal of Jenness and BerrieVermont Superior Court · 2006
  3. Merit Behavioral Care Corp. v. State of Vermont Independent Panel of Mental Health ProvidersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API