Legal Opinion
Richart v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 26, 2000No. 98-157PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
Defendants appeal from a summary judgment of the Chittenden Superior Court enforcing plaintiffs’ right to the use and enjoyment of certain improvements located in a common beach area on defendants’ property, and requiring defendants to pay a share of the insurance costs for the beach area and improvements. Defendants contend the court erred in ruling that they were bound by the terms of a Declaration of Conditions, Restrictions and Uses relating to the beach area and improvements because: (1) the failure to record the Declaration prior to the conveyance of their property to a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Samplid Enterprises, Inc. v. First Vermont BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- In Re Thomas Edward Ryan, Debtor. Peter M. Stern v. Continental Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Hart v. Farmers & Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
- Madden v. Omega Optical, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Badger v. HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Boulton v. CLD Consulting Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Long Trail House Condominium Assoc. v. Engelberth Construction, Inc. v. Morgan's Roofing & ConstructionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Webb v. LeClairSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Stevens v. StearnsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Lay v. Pettengill, NovotnySupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.