Legal Opinion

South Dakota Board of Regents v. Meister

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1981No. 12841, 12842PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

The parties to this appeal are: South Dakota Board of Regents (appellee), Inez Meister and Christine Reiger (appellants), and the State of South Dakota (intervenor-appellant).

Appeal is taken from a judgment of the circuit court, Sixth Judicial Circuit, which vacated the decision of the State Personnel Policy Board (Personnel Board) upon the basis that (1) the decision of the Personnel Board was rendered in violation of the state constitution and in excess of its authority, and (2) SDCL 3-6A-12, 3-6A-37 and 3-6A-38 are unconstitutional. We reverse.

An appreciation of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kneip v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Board of Regents v. CarterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People ex rel. T.L.J.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Carlson v. HudsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re HinesleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WolffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Kanaly v. State by and Through JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. South Dakota Board of Regents v. MeierhenrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. NEV. POLICY RESEARCH INST. v. MILLERNevada Supreme Court · 2024
  5. South Dakota Board of Regents v. HoopsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API