State v. Jones
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Larese Jones, has filed a motion to certify a conflict to the Ohio Supreme Court. He proposes that we certify the question of whether there is strict liability for the aggravated-robbery element requiring that the defendant “display the weapon, brandish it, indicate that [he] possesses it, or use it,” or whether recklessness is the mens rea for this element. See R.C. 2911.01(A)(1). However, we cannot certify a conflict under the circumstances existing herein.
{¶ 2} Notably, this court ruled in favor of appellant on this issue. That is, we agreed with his argument…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WharfOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. WBNS TV, Inc. v. DuesOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Pincelli v. Ohio Bridge Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Peters v. TiptonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015