Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 2009No. 07 MA 200PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Larese Jones, has filed a motion to certify a conflict to the Ohio Supreme Court. He proposes that we certify the question of whether there is strict liability for the aggravated-robbery element requiring that the defendant “display the weapon, brandish it, indicate that [he] possesses it, or use it,” or whether recklessness is the mens rea for this element. See R.C. 2911.01(A)(1). However, we cannot certify a conflict under the circumstances existing herein.

{¶ 2} Notably, this court ruled in favor of appellant on this issue. That is, we agreed with his argument…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. ColonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. WharfOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. WBNS TV, Inc. v. DuesOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Pincelli v. Ohio Bridge Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peters v. TiptonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API