Legal Opinion

United States v. R. H. Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 14, 1964No. 20516PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The United States as assignee of its contractor’s claims and demands against a subcontractor for contractual overpay-ments instituted this action for recovery on those claims. 1 An order granting appellee-subcontractor’s motion for summary judgment was entered, and the United States appeals that order. The order was in error. The United States’ motion for summary judgment should have been granted. On this appeal the primary questions before the court are, what law applies to the interpretation of a disputes clause in a subcontract under a contract to perform work on a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. WunderlichSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. ParnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. United States v. MoormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Reliant Energy Services, Inc. v. Enron Canada Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. Linan-Faye Construction Co., Inc. v. Housing Authority of the City of CamdenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Martinez v. Socoma Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Turner/Ozanne v. Hyman/PowerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Dunham R. Sellers and Jackie Sakiko Deki SellersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API