Legal Opinion
Gruber & Colabella, PA v. Erickson
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 14, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
784 A.2d 758 (2001)
345 N.J. Super. 248
GRUBER & COLABELLA, P.A., Plaintiff,
v.
John D. ERICKSON, Defendant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Special Civil Part, Sussex County.
Decided August 14, 2001.
Chris Colabella, for plaintiff, (Gruber & Colabella, P.A., attorneys), pro se.
No appearance for defendant.
GRAVES, J.S.C.
At issue is whether a law firm appearing pro se is entitled to receive "collection costs and attorneys fees" when it successfully sues a former client to recover fees for services rendered. There is no reported New Jersey decision that addresses this specific issue.
On…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Matter of RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- American Trial Lawyers Ass'n v. New Jersey Supreme CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Amer. Trial Lawyers Assoc. v. NJ Supreme Ct.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Segal v. LynchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- Ween v. DowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In Re ErnstDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Hrycak v. KiernanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- W. James Mac Naughton v. Shai HarmelechCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020