Legal Opinion

Ween v. Dow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 5, 2006PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Nardelli, J.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine, inter alia, whether a provision in a retainer agreement, which holds the client liable for attorneys’ fees incurred in the collection of fees generated under the retainer agreement, is void as against public policy.

Defendant Patricia Dow owns the shares allocated to two cooperative apartments located in the NoHo section of Manhattan. Defendant, a single mother, resides in one of the units with her two daughters, and sublets the other as an income-producing commercial studio. Plaintiff Jeffrey Ween, Esq., doing business…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. SassowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Matter of CoopermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. First National Bank v. BrowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. King v. FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. American Dental Cooperative, Inc. v. Attorney-GeneralAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. Comcast Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Landa v. DratchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Fraade v. Docuport, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Ferst v. AbrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. In Re ErnstDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API