Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 2003PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*217OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.1

Ira Solomon, Ph.D., and Ronald Smack (Claimant) (collectively Petitioners) petition for review of the July 11, 2002, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to deny a utilization review (UR) determination. We affirm.

Claimant suffered a work-related injury in January 1999 while working as a corrections officer for the City of Philadelphia (Employer). Specifically, Claimant injured his lower back during an altercation with a prison inmate. After diagnosis and initial treatment in March…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seamon v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Brothers v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Bey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Oscar Mayer & Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Central Highway Oil Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. James Corp. v. North Allegheny School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Womack v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. O'Donnell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Sweigart v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Barringer v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API