Brothers v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
McGINLEY, Judge.
Hess Brothers (Employer) appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) reversing a referee’s decision granting Employer’s petition for termination on the basis that Mary Anne Gornick (Claimant), the widow of Paul Gornick (Decedent), was living in a meretricious relationship under Section 307 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act)1. We affirm.
Employer filed a petition on January 25, 1984, for termination of compensation benefits payable to Claimant as of January 15, 1978, on the grounds that Claimant was living in a meretricious relationship.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Lehman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Nevius v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Sportswear v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Gabriel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Campbell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Buczynski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Iacono v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Hawkins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.