Legal Opinion

Brothers v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 24, 1989No. 2240 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGINLEY, Judge.

Hess Brothers (Employer) appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) reversing a referee’s decision granting Employer’s petition for termination on the basis that Mary Anne Gornick (Claimant), the widow of Paul Gornick (Decedent), was living in a meretricious relationship under Section 307 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act)1. We affirm.

Employer filed a petition on January 25, 1984, for termination of compensation benefits payable to Claimant as of January 15, 1978, on the grounds that Claimant was living in a meretricious relationship.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Lehman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Nevius v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Sportswear v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Gabriel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Campbell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Buczynski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Iacono v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Hawkins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API