Legal Opinion

Sweigart v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 2007PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Craig Sweigart (Claimant) petitions for review of the August 25, 2006, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to deny Claimant’s Petition for Review of Utilization Review Determination (UR Petition). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

On March 16,1989, Claimant sustained a low back injury during the course and scope of his employment with Burnham Corporation (Employer). On December 11, 2003, Employer filed a utilization review (UR) request, seeking review of the reasonableness and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Topps Chewing Gum v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Seamon v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Solomon v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Knouse v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bedford Somerset MHMR v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Turner)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Gary v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. A. Stamis v. WCAB (Delaware County IU)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. F. Hughes v. Wawa, Inc. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API