Legal Opinion
Malone v. Danforth
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1904No. Docket No. 9PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from Berrien; Coolidge, J. Bill by George J. Malone, by Cora Malone Smith, guardian, against Erskine Danforth, Flora A. Danforth, and Herbert M. Danforth to have certain conveyances declared mortgages. From the decree rendered, all parties appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
On June 24, 1899, complainant, the estate of Rachel Malone, deceased, .and the defendantErskine Danforth, acting for himself and Flora A. Dan-forth, entered into an agreement as follows:
“ Whereas, that certain tract of land situated in the-township of St. Joseph, county of Berrien, and State of Michigan, described as follows, to wit: That certain parcel of land described in a warranty deed dated June 9, 1886, wherein Rachel Malone is party of the first part, and George Julius Malone is party of the second part, recorded in the office of the register of deeds for Berrien county, November 11,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Campbell v. DearbornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Sowles v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Carveth v. WinegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fort v. ColbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Vandervelde v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- McKenna v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Leach v. DoleseMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Rapley v. McKinney's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.