Legal Opinion
Ballantyne Instruments & Electronics, Inc. v. Wagner
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 20, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 2672PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LAW JUDGMENT
WEINMAN, Chief Judge.
This matter was originally before the Court upon plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. On February 14, 1964, 227 F.Supp. 394, the Court found that each claim of the patent in suit was anticipated by the method for frying chick-i en in deep fat as disclosed in the publication Quantity Cookery (Revised Edition, published by Little Brown and Company, Boston, Massachusetts on January 12, 1951) and that since the application for the patent was filed more than one year after said publication, the patent was invalid. On appeal to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Allied Wheel Products, Inc. v. RudeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Columbia Broadcasting System v. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Alco Standard Corp. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1981
- Columbia Broadcasting System v. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969