Legal Opinion

Alco Standard Corp. v. Tennessee Valley Authority

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided May 29, 1981No. C-77-2513PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HORTON, District Judge.

The plaintiff, an assignee of a patent, has sued for damages based on the alleged in*432fringement of six of its patent claims on an ultrasonic inspection device for turbine rotors. The third party defendant, Westinghouse, has moved for summary judgment under the 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) defense of anticipation based on an alleged description of the invention in a publication more than one year prior to the patent application. The court finds that the article which contained the alleged description does not meet the full, clear and exact standard of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Tee-Pak, Inc. v. St. Regis Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  3. Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  4. Harries v. Air King Products Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  5. Allied Wheel Products, Inc. v. RudeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH v. Dart Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API