Legal Opinion

People v. Hardy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 17, 2007PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), dated July 25, 2005, which, after a hearing and upon the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under risk factor 7 of the Sex Offender Registration Act Guidelines (hereinafter the SORA Guidelines), 20 points are assessed if the sex offender’s crime, inter alia, was “directed at a stranger” (Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. People v. ArotinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. People v. HegazyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. DickisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. MabeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. FinizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. People v. BrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API