Legal Opinion
People v. Lynk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 8, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated September 12, 2008, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant failed to show, by clear and convincing evidence, that special circumstances existed warranting a downward departure from his presumptive risk level two sex…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- People v. GuamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. GoodwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. AtkinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BennisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. BurgessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. CharltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010