Donnell v. Cox
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee CueiaM.
Tbe appellant assigns as error tbe findings of fact by tbe court below. However, tbe assignment is not supported by an excep tion to snob findings, therefore, it is feckless. Worsley v. Rendering Co., 239 N.C. 547, 80 S.E. 2d 467; Wyatt v. Sharp, 239 N.C. 655, 80 S.E. 2d 762. Moreover, when no exception is taken to findings of fact, they are presumed to be supported by the evidence and are binding on appeal. Wyatt v. Sharp, supra, and cases cited therein.
The ruling of the court below is
Affirmed.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Wyatt v. SharpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- James v. PretlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- City of Raleigh v. MorandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Suits v. Old Equity Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Stancil v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.