Legal Opinion
Fuller v. Rich
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 10, 1994No. 93-01767PublishedCited by 313 opinions
1Per curiam
Joel Fuller appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. According to Fuller, he cannot file an administrative appeal because he did not receive notice of the Parole Commission’s decision until the time for filing such an appeal had elapsed. See 28 C.F.R. § 2.26 (1993) (an appeal to the National Appeals Board must be made within 30 days from the date of entry of the decision).
A prisoner challenging a Parole Commission decision is required to exhaust his administrative remedies before seeking habeas relief in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- James B. Gardner and Sally I. Gardner v. School Board Caddo ParishCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Ricky Kevin Smith v. Ron G. Thompson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Dan S. Hessbrook v. M.C. Lennon, Jr., D.A. French, and J. SaxmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Celedonio Santana v. Ronald Chandler, District Director, InsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Dcp Farms v. Clayton Yeutter, Secretary of Agriculture, and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Stabilization & Conservation ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by313 opinions
- Ricardo Gallegos-Hernandez v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Joseph Montano v. State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Skinner v. WileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Frederick Fillingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Iacaboni v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
308 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.