Legal Opinion

Rosebar v. Hogan

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 4, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2017-0932Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F I L E D FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEC ~4 2017 MICHAEL ROSEBAR, et al., m srk, U.S. D|str|ct & Bankrupw ) Plaimiffs’ § C°"l'!s fur the District of Co|umb|a v. § Civil Action No. l7-932 (UNA) JUDGE THOMAS F. HOGAN, el al., § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ applications to proceed in forma pauperis and their pro se civil complaint. The applications will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed. Michael Rosebar and Erin Rosebar were defendants in a criminal matter, see United States v. Rosebar~ Crim. No.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Abella v. RubinoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API