Legal Opinion

Kilcrease v. Domenico Transportation Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 12, 2016No. 15-1320PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McHUGH, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Mark Kilcrease is a commercial truck driver who was temporarily unable to work due to the effects of cancer. After his cancer went into remission, Mr. Kilcrease applied for a truck-driving position with Domenico Transportation Company. Do-menico rejected Mr. Kilcrease’s application, and he filed suit, alleging discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The district court granted summary judgment to Domenico on both claims, and Mr. Kilcrease appeals.

We conclude the district court properly granted summary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & JanerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Morgan v. Hilti, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  2. Hiatt v. Colorado SeminaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  3. Ford v. Jackson National LifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  4. Howard v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2017
  5. Aguilar v. N2MISDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API