Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & Janer
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Pro se Plaintiff Delmer Garrett appeals the dismissal of his claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961, 1962, and 1964, against the law firm of Selby, Conner, Maddux & Janer and several individual attorneys. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm 1 .
I. BACKGROUND
A. District Court Proceedings
Plaintiffs complaint alleged that Defendants violated RICO by “engaging] in various schemes intended to use sham legal process to defraud and extort money and property from American citizens.” R. Vol. I, doc. 1 at 2-3.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Bobby J. Anderson v. Alfred HardmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Utahns for Better Transportation v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,604 opinions
- Kay v. BemisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Gallagher v. SheltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Shrader v. BiddingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- James v. WadasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Jordan v. SosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
1,599 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.