Legal Opinion

Bettencourt v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1954No. Civ. 15668PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries, appeals from a judgment sustaining defendant State of California’s demurrer without leave to amend.

Questions Presented

1. Can the court take judicial notice of the character of the operation of the Dumbarton Bridge by the State of California ?

2. Is that operation governmental or proprietary ?

Complaint

The complaint alleged that defendant State of California, together with the other defendants, operated and maintained “that certain bridge and highway” between the counties of Alameda and San Mateo, commonly known as Dumbarton Bridge. It then alleges…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Berglund v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Varcoe v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Talley v. Northern San Diego County Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Thrasher v. Amere Gas Utilities Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Hoagland v. StreeperIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Spielman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Plaza v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Pacific Inter-Club Yacht Ass'n v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API