Legal Opinion
Muller v. Tanner
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 9, 1969No. Civ. 25984PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
In this action plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of dismissal signed, filed and entered after his failure to post security as required by an order which determined he was a vexatious litigant and ordered him to post $5,000 in cash, or bond, within 10 days of the order. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 391-391.6.) His multifarious contentions are set forth in 21 points and XIII propositions and arguments (including, by reference seven points raised in prior proceedings in which a petition for writ of mandate was denied by Division Three of this court (1 Civ. 29430, September 19,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Burton H. Wolfe v. Ronald M. George, Chief Justice Deborah SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Moran v. Murtaugh Miller Meyer & Nelson, LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re BittakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- First Western Development Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Reisman v. ShahverdianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.