Legal Opinion
City of Hanford v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 6, 1989No. Docket Nos. F011558, F011559PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
Statement of the Case
Petitioners City of Hanford, Hanford City Council, Hanford Planning and Building Departments, Hanford City Planning Director James Beath and the individual city council members (City or Petitioners) seek a writ of prohibition or mandamus directing respondent Kings County Superior Court to vacate (1) its order granting real party in interest GWF Power Systems Company, Inc. (GWF), leave to file a cross-complaint and all temporary restraining orders (TRO) issued pursuant to the cross-complaint and (2) its order denying Petitioners’ motion to disqualify…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Conopco, Inc. v. Roll International and Paramount Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Sullivan v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Zilog, Inc. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Home Ins. Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Grant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.