Legal Opinion

In Re Karch's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1945No. Docket No. 15, Calendar No. 42,886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

This is an appeal by Catherine Karch as guardian of Laura Jean Marie Karch, a minor, hereinafter referred to as Laura Jean, from an order entered by the circuit court for Monroe county denying Laura Jean’s claim to a share in the distribution of the estate of her father, Dr. Arthur W'. Karch. The statute on which Laura Jean bases her claim is as follows:

“When any testator shall omit to provide in his will for any of his children, or for the issue of any deceased child, and it shall appear that such omission was not intentional, but was made by mistake or accident, such child, or the issue of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vannett v. Michigan Public Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Hazen v. RockefellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Besh v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCarty C. Mercury Metalcraft Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Brady v. Central Excavators, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Firemen's Insurance v. Sterling Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hall v. HorakMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Minkus v. SargeMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API