Fuster v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.
We decide: (I.A) whether Maryland Rule 4-707(b) entitles an indigent petitioner to appointed counsel for purposes of a petition under Md.Code Ann., Crim. Proc. (2001, 2008 Repl. Vol., 2013 Supp.) (“CP”) § 8-201; (I.B) whether the Circuit Court for Montgomery County (“the circuit court”) abused its discretion in not considering whether to appoint counsel for David E. Fuster (“Fuster”), Appellant, for purposes of a petition under CP § 8-201; (II) whether the circuit court erred in applying an incorrect standard in ruling on the petition under CP § 8-201; and (III) whether Fuster preserved for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Perez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Tribbitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Hoile v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- State v. RichCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Wallace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Johnson v. FrancisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.