Legal Opinion

Fuster v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 22, 2014No. 41/13PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

We decide: (I.A) whether Maryland Rule 4-707(b) entitles an indigent petitioner to appointed counsel for purposes of a petition under Md.Code Ann., Crim. Proc. (2001, 2008 Repl. Vol., 2013 Supp.) (“CP”) § 8-201; (I.B) whether the Circuit Court for Montgomery County (“the circuit court”) abused its discretion in not considering whether to appoint counsel for David E. Fuster (“Fuster”), Appellant, for purposes of a petition under CP § 8-201; (II) whether the circuit court erred in applying an incorrect standard in ruling on the petition under CP § 8-201; and (III) whether Fuster preserved for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Perez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Tribbitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Hoile v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. State v. RichCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wallace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Johnson v. FrancisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  3. Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API