Legal Opinion

Perez v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 17, 2011No. 94, September Term, 2010PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*60GREENE, J.

Petitioners, Policarpio Espinoza Perez (“Perez”) and Adam Espinoza Canela (“Canela”), were convicted of murder and related offenses in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. Before this Court, Petitioners challenge the non-disclosure of multiple jury notes submitted to the judge during the course of the trial. Specifically, the Petitioners presented one question for our review:

Did the Court of Special Appeals err in applying a weakened harmless error test to the admittedly erroneous nondisclosure to counsel of six substantive jury notes in this case?

We shall answer the question in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Midgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Deville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Gargliano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Winder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Nicolas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Dionas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Harrison-Solomon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Fuster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API