Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 19, 2014No. 97/13PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

We decide: (I) whether a circuit court judge other than a county administrative judge or that judge’s designee may deny a motion to postpone; (IIA) whether a trial court abuses its discretion in denying a motion to postpone to obtain counsel because the trial court does not ask questions of a self-represented defendant who has expressly waived the right to counsel after being advised of the right to counsel under Maryland Rule 4-215(b) (Express Waiver of Counsel); (II.B) whether, here, a trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion to postpone to review discovery materials because a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Vermont v. BrillonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bellard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Gerety & Antkowiak v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Phillips v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  5. Vaise v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API