Legal Opinion
In Re Petition of Luke NICHTER
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 11, 2013No. Misc. No. 2012-0074PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EX PARTE MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Now before the Court is the petitioner’s Motion [1] to unseal records associated with United States v. Liddy, District Court docket number 1827-72. Upon consideration of the Motion [1], the government’s opposition [10], petitioner’s reply [11], the government’s ex parte Surreply [notice of submission at docket entry 14], 1 the applicable law and for the reasons set forth below, the petition will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Petitioner Luke Nichter, a professor at Texas A & M University, submitted a letter asking…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States Department of Justice v. JulianSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Michael J. Corbitt, Pulitzer Community Newspapers, Inc., Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Charmer Industries, Inc., and Peerless Importers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- In Re Oliver L. North (Omnibus Order)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. SchletteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stuart McKeever v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Sennett v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Anthony S. Pitch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Anthony S. Pitch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Anthony S. Pitch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.