People v. Rotter
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Emmet; Shepherd, J. George W. Rotter was convicted of selling colored oleomargarine.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.
At its last session the legislature passed an act under the title “An act to prevent deception in the manufacture and sale of imitation butter.” Pub. Acts 1901, Act No. 22. Section 1 of said act provides that:
“No person, by himself or his agents or servants, shall render or manufacture, sell, offer for sale, expose for sale, or have in his possession with intent to sell, any article, product, or compound made wholly or in part out of any fat, oil, or oleaginous substance or compound thereof, not produced from unadulterated milk, or cream from the same, which shall be in imitation of yellow…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Capital City Dairy Co. v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- People v. . ArensbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Butler v. Marshall ChambersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- People v. Worden Grocer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. FreemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Bennett v. CarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. ChristianMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- People v. HinshawMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.