People v. . Arensberg
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from a judgment of the general term of the supreme court in the second department, affirming a judgment of the court of sessions of King’s county, of 10th December, 1886, convicting the defendant of the sale of articles or products in imitation or semblance of butter.
1Opinion of the Court
Rapallo. J.
The offense for which the appellant was indicted, and of which he was convicted, was that at, etc., he “ did unlawfully, willfully and knowingly have in his possession for sale, keep for sale, offer, for sale, and cause and procure to be sold, to certain persons,” etc., “ a number of pounds of a certain article and product, made and manufactured in semblance and imitation of natural butter, that is to say, butter made and produced from pure, unadulterated milk, and cream from the same,’’etc., “the same notbeingthen and there natural butter, as he (the said Lipman Arensberg) then…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Mangan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Pierce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
3Cited by64 opinions
- People v. . GillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Plumley v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- People v. . HavnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- People v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.