Capital City Dairy Co. v. Ohio
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF' OHIO. Tee case is stated in- the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
By a law of the State of Ohio, enacted in 1884, it was made the duty of every one manufacturing or exposing for sale any drug or article of food included in the provisions of the act to furnish, on dérnand, to the person who should apply for and tender the value of the same a sufficient sample to' enable an analysis to be made. This law is compiled in Bates’ Annotated Ohio Statutes, sec. 4200-7.
By the provisions of another statute, enacted in 1886, and amended in 1887, it was made unlawful to sell or offer for sale or exchange any substance purporting, appearing or represented to be butter or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. E. C. Knight Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Plumley v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.