Legal Opinion

People v. Christian

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1906No. Docket No. 214PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Alcona; Connine, J. Frank Christian was convicted of trespass under Act No.i^lO, Pub. Acts 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The respondent was convicted under Act No. 210, Pub. Acts 1903, of inducing and directing another to cut and remove certain timber from State tax homestead lands. The statute provides that every person not lawfully authorized, who shall enter upon or induce or direct any person to enter upon such lands and cut timber therefrom, shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and be punished by imprisonment in the State prison for a term not exceeding two years, or by a fine not exceeding $500, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

The act which this amended (1 Comp. Laws, § 1394) provided for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LongwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Semer v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. People v. RotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Michigan Dairy Co. v. RunnelsMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Collier v. SmaltzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Beuthien v. DillonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Price v. StarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Baroda State Bank v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API