Legal Opinion
Porter v. Huber
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 21, 1946No. 735PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAVY, District Judge.
The defendants in this case have as counsel attorneys Robert C. Finley, George H. Layman and Plarold Troy.
During the course of an argument involving preliminary motions it was stated by attorney George H. Layman that he desired to withdraw from his representation of the defendants for the reason that it had been brought to his attention that while an attorney and employee of the plaintiff he had written a letter to the defendants concerning the matter in controversy. Upon interrogation by the Court it appeared that attorney Robert C. Finley, at the time the letter was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gesellschaft Fur Drahtlose Telegraphie M. B. H. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
- Brown v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923
- United States v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
3Cited by13 opinions
- T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Celanese Corporation and Fiber Industries, Inc. v. Leesona Corporation, Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Standard Oil CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Consolidated Theatres, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Circuit Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.