Legal Opinion
In Re Roberts
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah
Decided February 4, 1985No. 19-20846PublishedCited by 200 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLEN E. CLARK, Bankruptcy Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
These cases, consolidated for purposes of this opinion, come before the Court on two applications for allowance of interim compensation filed by the law firm of Roe & Fowler, attorneys for debtors in possession in both cases. Raised here is the recurring question of whether or not a law firm’s representation of more than one party to a case creates a conflict of interest that warrants a disallowance or reduction in the legal fees and costs requested. For the reasons set forth below, the applications in both of these cases are…
2Cases cited111 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Bank of Marin v. EnglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by200 opinions
- In Re Larry T. & Cynthia J. Martin D/B/A a & W Drive-In Restaurant & Martin's Exxon, Debtors. Appeal of Larry T. & Cynthia J. MartinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- In Re Arochem CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Bernard P. Rome v. Joseph Braunstein, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- In Re Jensen-Farley Pictures, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
- In Re RobertsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1987
195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.