Commonwealth v. Tucker
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, President Judge:
Appellees Tucker and Sparling were charged with the crimes of burglary, theft, receiving stolen property, and conspiracy. The Commonwealth here appeals the trial court’s order suppressing all the evidence gained through the use of an allegedly defective search warrant. 1 The sole issue before us is whether a deliberate misstatement of fact in an affidavit for a search warrant always invalidates the warrant. We hold that it does not and reverse the suppression order of the court below.
Testimony at appellees’ non jury trial established that on October 18,1975, two white…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Mulloy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Commonwealth v. MillikenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LuddySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. BonasorteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Cruse v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. ZimmermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. MintonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.