Cruse v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
Appellant Tim Michael Cruse appeals from the judgment and commitment of the superior court finding him guilty of robbery.1 The issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress evidence seized, pursuant to a warrant, from his automobile trunk when the trunk had previously been searched without a warrant.
On September 30,1976, Stephan Pittman, field man at the Sundowner Drive-in Theater in Anchorage, had an altercation with three young men in a white car who were disturbing other patrons. Pittman got his supervisor’s…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- People v. ArnauNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Reeves v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Waring v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.