Legal Opinion
Eaton v. Continental General Insurance
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 26, 2001No. 3:99CV7541PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This is a diversity action arising under Ohio Revised Code § 3901.46(B)(1), in which plaintiff alleges that defendants breached a statutory duty when they failed to notify plaintiff that he tested positive for the HIV virus. Plaintiff also alleges negligence and breach of contract because of defendants’ failure to notify him about the test results. Pending are defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Docs. 71, 72, 77, and 78). For the following reasons, defendants’ motions shall be granted
BACKGROUND
On May 6, 1997, plaintiff, David Eaton, applied to Continental…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- General Electric Company v. G. Siempelkamp Gmbh & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kent State University Board of Trustees v. Lexington Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- McLachlan v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Brittingham v. Gen. Motors Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hussein v. City of PerrysburgDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Crooksville Family Clinic v. Quest Diagnostics IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.