Legal Opinion
Hussein v. City of Perrysburg
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 10, 2009No. Case 3:07CV1715PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.
This is a case about constitutional rights. Plaintiffs Fadhil A. Hussein, M.D., and Raya K. Ahmed bring a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against two Perrysburg, Ohio, employees, defendants Rick Thielen and Roud C. Klag. Plaintiffs allege that Thielen and Klag acted in violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment in their enforcement of City zoning ordinances.
Jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1367. Pending is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. [Doc. 64]. For the reasons that follow, I grant summary judgment as…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hussein v. City of PerrysburgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010