Legal Opinion

Berry v. Robertson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 9, 1970No. 7 Div. 820PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Appeal by plaintiff from adverse verdict, directed for defendant without hypothesis, by the trial court following the closing of plaintiff’s case. Defendant offered no evidence.

The complaint was in three counts, 5, 6, and 7, all charging malpractice in the treatment of plaintiff’s minor child, who died in the hospital following aspiration of a bean or pea into its right lung. Demurrers were sustained to Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 9. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence the defendant rested and requested in writing the general affirmative charge with and without hypothesis as to Counts 5,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smarr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Parrish v. SpinkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. HARVEY REGLAND COMPANY v. NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Snow v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Watterson v. ConwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Baker v. ChastainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Drs. Lane, Bryant, Eubanks & Dulaney v. OttsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Rosemont, Inc. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Harper v. Baptist Medical Center-PrincetonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Sealy v. McElroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API