Parrish v. Spink
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Justice.
This is a malpractice suit brought against an oral surgeon. At the conclusion of the evidence, the court gave the general affirmative charge in favor of the defendant.
The jury’s verdict was in accordance with the court’s instructions, and judgment for the defendant was entered pursuant to the verdict. The plaintiff below has perfected this appeal from the judgment.
The plaintiff, Mrs. Ruth H. Parrish, was referred by her regular dentist to the defendant, Dr. John H. Spink, an oral surgeon, for the purpose of having three teeth extracted
One of the teeth to be extracted was an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Davis v. KerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Sellers v. NoahSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- McKinnon v. PolkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Carraway v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Ex Parte HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Bell v. HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Holt v. GodsilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Zills v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Drs. Lane, Bryant, Eubanks & Dulaney v. OttsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.